Scifi Channel Becomes Syfy Channel
By David Halpert on Mar 17, 2009 with Comments 2
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed or subscribe via Twitter. Thanks for visiting!

The popular specialty channel, SciFi Channel, owned by NBC Universal and home to such television programs of Eureka, Torchwood, and Battlestar Galactica has decided to rebrand its website and magazine from scifi.com to syfy.com.
Now (as Robert J. Sawyer points out on his blog) most science fiction authors don’t like the term ‘sci-fi’ to describe their works. For many writers of the genre ‘sci-fi’ brings with it a connotation of entertainment science fiction, basically Star Trek and Star Wars, what people’s perceptions of science fiction are rather than what it actually is meant to be. If anything, Sawyer notes, authors prefer the abbreviated SF.
Dave Howe, President for the channel, said that the Sci-fi name was limiting and followed it up with this statement in a recent article to the New York Times (read the full article here). “If you ask people their default perceptions of Sci Fi, they list space, aliens and the future,” he added. “That didn’t capture the full landscape of fantasy entertainment: the paranormal, the supernatural, action and adventure, superheroes.”
Honestly, I don’t really care for the change. I think the bigger question is who will receive the domain name for Scifi.com? Will it simply direct users to the new syfy.com? Personally I get new users added to Twitter every day just by virtue of having ‘Scifi’ in my username ‘ScifiWatch’. In my opinion I think the change will do more harm than good. For one thing it may detract some advertisers and viewers who have long been loyal to the Scifi brand. But putting that aside for a second, despite people’s perceptions of science fiction, when you see the Scifi Channel it’s a clear indicator of the genre. What do people conjure up when they hear Syfy? Some kind of sponge?
Filed Under: Featured • Television • Television News

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=6eaf4e67-75c7-4e1b-a418-12dd196f3f76)




The real issue is that SciFi hasn’t been about SciFi for a long, long time. It’s about cheap entertainment that caters to the lowest common denominator and under Bonnie Hammer added an endless array of garbage bargain-basement-budget movies, wrestling and NBC reruns. It stopped being a channel for anyone who cared about science fiction long ago and I’ll admit that while I used to leave that channel on for the vast majority of my television viewing, now… I can’t remember the last time I actually tuned in. Between all the pseudo-scientific “reality” show nonsense and the WWE spandex-clad bad acting, there’s simply no reason to pay any attention to the network. If I was paying for the next level of cable programming just for that channel, as I once did, I’d have canceled by now.
I have yet to find anyone who thinks this is a good idea and no end to the people who are basically writing “SyFy” off forever. Farewell SciFi, and good riddance.
[Reply]
The thing is we need to be subscribing and I mean literally subscribing to the channel. Much like that of HBO etc. That way you have no commercials like the original promise of pay tv in the first place. Look at it this way maybe someone else will make another SCI-FI channel after the one now has changed to SYFY “siffy” and actually keep with the programming of the people that love sf
[Reply]