Rant: Why ‘The Mist’ Will Be Watched For Decades
By David Halpert on May 30, 2009 with Comments 4

- Image via Wikipedia
Click Here to View the Works of Stephen King at Amazon
Click Here to View the Works of Stephen King on Ebay
‘The Mist’ was a horror film released in 2007 and was based on the Stephen King novella of the same name. It starred Thomas Jane and Laurie Holden and was written and directed by Frank Darabont, who holds The Green Mile and The Shawshank Redemption to his credit, both as a writer and a director. The basic premise of this film is a thick mist billows over a small town trapping much of the townspeople in the local supermarket. Inside the mist, however, are horrifying creatures from an alternate universe bent on killing whatever human is in sight.
Now the film did fairly well at the box office, and like the Stephen King novella it was based on was more about what happens to normal citizens trying to survive. Had it not been written by Frank Darabont, The Mist would have been easily written off as another clichéd horror film, en par with something like John Carpenter’s The Thing (not to say that The Thing wasn’t awesome in its own right).
However, that’s not what makes this film so good.
WARNING SPOILERS AHEAD!
By the end of the film (read at your own risk!) our main character, David, is hunkered in a car with Dan, Amanda, Irene, and Billy as the car slowly runs out of gas on the interstate highway. They have a gun, however, there are only four bullets in the chamber, and rather than being willing victims of a more violent death at the hands of these chambers, David wipes out everyone in the car in a five-second span. After leaving the car, David, expecting death, finds a convoy of military vehicles coming up the road, with everyone that survived back at the supermarket in tow, and the mist slowly recedes into nothingness.
Now while this may go into history as one of the most depressing movie endings ever, this isn’t why it will be watched for decades.
The reason it will stand the test of time is because the original ending was completely different. In this alternate ending they have five bullets in the gun’s chamber and just as David is about to pull the trigger they get a signal on the radio telling them that help is on the way, leaving everyone to survive.
This is one of the few instances in modern cinema where I’ve heard of a happier ending being swapped for a more depressing ending. This is why this film is so memorable. Would it have done better with the clichéd happier ending? A guaranteed no! ‘The Mist’ will stand for decades, not only as one of Stephen King’s most faithful adaptations, but also for defying the norms of the ‘horror genre’ in this manner. A change that won’t soon be forgotten, at least by this blogger.
Filed Under: Film

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=78bc6527-32f6-46b3-9446-d892ba91aa57)




That was a horrible horrible movie. The characters were all cookie-cutter generic, and the ending was terrible. After spending so much time fighting for their lives against insurmountable odds, at the end they decide to commit suicide because they run out of gas? Really? There’s no possible other solution to that problem? That movie made me physically angry, and the ending was a thrown in token twist ending that didn’t make sense.
[Reply]
“The Mist” provoked a similar blog post from me. I don’t know how I could have let it go without writing about it. Was it a good alternate ending? Yeah, totally unexpected for a fan of the novella. But what meaning are we to take away from the film, with an ending like that? I’ve pondered the social statements Darabont (the director) could have been trying to make, and it just seems like a self-confusing message. Right after he kills his son and friends, the Army passes by and the woman who left the store is one of the passengers. What the heck does that mean, were they supposed to leave with her? And in regard to the “political-religious” situation in the store and the climate of post-911 America where we sacrifice our soldiers to appease the terrorist boogeyman, what is Darabont trying to say about surviving these days?
[Reply]
I have to agree with aaron. The ending makes no sense to me either.
I had to watch the movie after reading this post a couple of days ago (without reading the spoiler part or reading the original story).
. It would be a good ending though to end it 5 minutes earlier. With no gas in the tank, a gun with 4 bullets and 5 people and let the movie goer makes his own thoughts about what is going to happen next.
And wasn’t the acting terrible through the whole movie? What was the GAAAAAAAAAAAAH! at the end of the movie? “I can’t do crying scenes, so I’ll do some improv shouting”.
[Reply]
I’ve read the book and loved it and that’s why I stayed away from the movie (I’ve been burned before, Desperation anyone?) but now it might be worth a look. I’ll reserve judgement till then.
[Reply]